There has also been an argument that violence will also be experienced in the absence of the guns. There are other weapons that can be used to perpetrate violence, and other factors should be considered in controlling violence apart from confiscating guns and bringing other laws that control gun possession. For instance, there was reported a case where a young man stabbed his fellow student with a screwdriver in a high school.
He did not need a gun to commit the murder, yet there was crime in the school. People are also denied freedom of some activities such as hunting. For many people, hunting is a hobby, and a gun is used in hunting the wild animals. When there are gun control laws, it is very obvious that they are deprived of their interest in their hobby.
For these reasons, there should no be gun control laws, as people should be allowed to use the guns at their discretion Dixon, Most Americans cling to the second amendment that allows citizens to hold firearms wherever they go for their own safety.
Most people also believe that the second amendment was placed so that the citizens would be protected from the tyrannical government that seemed to keep people in fear. People would have the power to rebel in case the government introduced dictatorial policies for their people.
However, though this was not the main aim why people were issued with guns, it served as a purpose as the power of the government would be regulated in a way that the people would be given a chance to make their own ideas and also be given a voice in the government. This is because of the power they were believed to have after they were given the go- ahead to possess the firearms. The second amendment states that the right of people to keep their arms should not be infringed by any means.
The amendment mentions a well- regulated militia which is a phrase that means a group of citizens that act in position of an army. It continues to describe that it is necessary to the security of a free state. In this phrase, it means that the group will be in the frontline in making sure that it meets the goals and the interests of the citizen army. The main objective of the citizen army is to protect the best interests of the country, as well as, protecting the government also from foreign intervention.
This means that when the gun control laws are being introduced, the main intention of introducing the second amendment is being assumed. This means that the country would be left at the stake of only the military and the citizens would not have the power of protecting their government, as well as, the best interests of their nation Lott Another main reason why the second amendment was made was that the South would be able to control the slaves.
Guns would be essential in helping carry out slavery in the South at ease. Therefore, state militias served as slave patrols where they had to be given the mandate and responsibility to hold guns so that they would be able to control the slaves. The second amendment was also made because of the rebellions that used to take place in the country. For example, the whiskey rebellion caused the government to revoke the amendment as a way of controlling the militias in helping stop the rebellion.
The farmers were rebelling against the government for imposing a new tax, yet it had not been there previously. When the amendment was made, room for rebel had not been created against the government.
However, such rebellions were experienced when the government was not in a position to meet certain needs of the people or it acted in such a way that people viewed as selfish or had corrupt intentions. For this reason, the state has been enjoying its democratic right because rebellions and demonstrations are respected because the government realizes the power within the people. If such power had not been vested in the people, it would be difficult in the United States to stage rebellions and demonstrations in fight for human rights and freedom.
Imposing gun control laws in the country is, therefore, a way of curtailing freedom in the United States, as the people may lack the voice and the authority they had previously Bijlefeld There has also been an argument that it is not the guns that kill people, but it is the people themselves who kill other people.
In this context, those against the gun controls argue that it is a personal initiative for a criminal to engage in crime, whether he holds a gun or not. In this regard, he does not have to possess gun for him to hold a gun. More comparisons are made between other weapons that are used to kill people and the guns that are always blamed for being used in killing people.
People use crude weapons including screwdrivers, knives, swords or any metallic objects if they have the intention to kill other people. The gun just necessitates and quickens the process, and they argue that the killing would still have taken place, in the absence of the gun. Therefore, before placing the gun control laws as a measure to reduce violence and crime, more research should be indulged and there should be other actions that ought to be taken as a way of reducing the violence.
For example, most people who commit these crimes are usually in the influence of high drug intoxication. It is these drugs that will make them use the guns or other weapons around them in committing violence.
The best way to help reduce violence in such a person would not be confiscating the gun he is carrying, but rehabilitating him as a way to reduce the drug use in him. This is because even after taking the gun, the drug effects may show him to use other weapons to commit the crime.
The format of a research paper also suggests that you use more sources in your research than in a simple five-paragraph essay. Most often, you will have to cite at least five sources. Moreover, in a research paper, it is recommended to rely not only on printed materials but also on your empirical research. To conclude, a research paper - as the name suggests - centers around what researchers have to say on the topic.
This means that you should focus on the research data that already exists in a given field rather than on opinions, including your own. Obviously, gun control is the kind of topic that inspires bias. This suggests a lot of opinions on the issue - some more reasoned than others.
Regardless of what essay you are writing, it is a piece of academic writing and cannot be a "naked" presentation of an opinion. All suggestions that you make in your essay have to be substantiated with solid evidence. Therefore, an extensive research is necessary for any kind of paper on gun control.
This involves both the background of the issue and the pro and anti gun control arguments. As we have already mentioned, any talk about gun control goes down to the Second Amendment to the Constitution - so, this is where your research should begin.
The amendment was passed over years ago, and it has been clarified by quite a few precedent court cases over the years, on both state and federal levels - so, it is only beneficial for you to be informed about those.
The most notable cases include United States v. Cruikshank , the United States v. Miller , District of Columbia v. Heller , McDonald v. Chicago , and others. Once you are familiar with these, you can say that you are familiar with the historical background of the issue. Gun control is a polarizing topic, so you probably already had your own opinion about it.
Now that you have more insight into the background of the issue, your opinion will be more reasoned. Nevertheless, no piece of academic writing should be exclusively opinion-based. So, you should also be well-informed about what experts have to say on the issue from both sides of the argument. The most obvious way to find those is to look through the gun control articles, analytics and documentaries on the topic from respectable media like Business Week, CNN, LA Times, New Yorker, etc.
Anti gun control articles argue that the turnover and possession should either not be controlled any more than it is, or not be controlled at all. Here are some of the recent examples of such articles from reputable media:. In his article, he claims that gun control tendencies are purely populist and should they succeed, they do not specify with the already existing massive amount of guns possessed by individuals.
In his article, he blames the gun control lobbyists for being fanatics who do not seek to have a constructive dialogue with the other side of the argument, no better than witch hunters. If you want a deeper insight into her story, you might as well check out her book American Wife: A Criminologist's Case Against Gun Control by Jacob Davidson, Time In this article, Davidson clarifies what gun control actually is and puts to question various popularly suggested gun control methods.
In this piece, he counters the gun control lobbyists' position that gun possession provokes gun violence with a number of cases where gun possession has actually prevented crime. This position is popular among researchers and other experts, so such articles can be found in abundance. Here are some of the most interesting examples:. Gun Control Essay Gun control is one of the most pressing issues today.
Let us take a closer look at some of these essay types: Descriptive gun control essay. A descriptive essay will focus on how the issue under discussion makes you feel in terms of senses - how it looks, what sounds or even smells you associate with the guns being widespread or with their absence, etc. Definition gun control essay. A definition essay is basically a more expanded version of a dictionary article. You define what one should mean by gun control. Compare and contrast gun control essay.
In a compare and contrast, you simply list the differences and, possibly, similarities between pro and anti gun control approaches or between the people adopting these approaches.
Cause and effect gun control essay. A cause and effect essay will take a particular gun control-related effect and investigate what caused it.
Narrative essay on gun control. A narrative essay will be about your or someone else's experience related to gun control. Process gun control essay. A process essay talks about how to solve a particular issue. In our case, it can be about how to put an end to gun violence through gun control regulations, for example. Argumentative gun control essay. An argumentative essay is aimed at conveying the author's viewpoint in a well-substantiated manner. Critical essay on gun control.
A critical essay discusses the strengths and weaknesses of a certain approach to gun control policy. Expository gun control essay. In an expository essay, you put your opinion aside and simply present the issue as it is - for example, the current state of gun control debate.
Persuasive gun control essay. A persuasive essay is much like an argumentative one, only you don't just convey your argument, but you are to persuade your reader - often with a polar opinion on the issue - that your viewpoint is the right one. Our features - Exclusively on on writemypaperz.
SWK Introduction to Social work Professor Rubin Gun Control Gun control is a term that describes the use of law to limit people's access to handguns, shotguns, rifles, and other firearms, through passing statutes that require, for example, gun purchasers to undergo background checks for criminal records, for guns to be registered, or a.
Gun Control Introduction. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, the citizens have the right to possess and bear arms. But, this has remained an important issue since decades.
Gun Control Essay Examples. total results. A Debate Over the Issue of Gun control in Canada. 1, words. words. 1 page. An Introduction to the Creative Essay on the Topic of Guns. 1, words. 4 pages. Gun Control Holds Some Fundamental Things to Hold True. words. 1 page. Should an Ordinary Citizen Consider Gun Ownership for. Gun Control Notes Essay and the safety of others By Jonathan Masters, online writer/editor for the Council on Foreign Relations Introduction The debate over gun control in the United States has waxed and waned over the years.
Narrative gun control essay. In a narrative essay, you tell a story about an experience – yours or someone else’s, real-life or fictional. You can tell a story about guns and what happened because of certain gun control regulations or what could have happened if they were different. A narrative essay will be about your (or someone else's) experience related to gun control. Process gun control essay. A process essay talks about how to solve a particular issue. In our case, it can be about how to put an end to gun violence through gun control regulations, for example. The introduction is where you present your topic.