The government should have the right to put limits on where others are being harmed. This takes away the rights stated in the ninth amendment in the Constitution. So if the United Stated banned smoking, wouldn't it make all of this easier to handle? I believe that question has only one simple answer. Watch your habits, for they become character. Then your habit will just become another part of you and will turn into normal daily activities. The one time you try smoking may cause many regrets for years to come.
These will become difficult to overcome later in life. If smoking becomes a habit, it is likely to become part of your character. Nicotine is the element in the cigarette that causes the strong addiction.
More than thirteen million smokers try to quit each year, but less than five percent of those who attempt it actually do. A nicotine addiction is harder to beat than most people realize. Nicotine from smoking changes the structure and function of your brain. When the brain stops getting the nicotine it's used to, you begin feeling strong withdrawal cravings.
You think you want a cigarette when, actually, your brain wants nicotine. Each puff on a cigarette sends nicotine to the brain within ten seconds.
So we have another puff and another. Soon, the brain's chemical structure actually changes. It becomes hooked into wanting more and more nicotine to make the effects last. Then without even knowing it, you are addicted.
So the next time you are about to smoke a single cigarette, remember all of the lives, other than yours, that you are affecting. If smoking became illegal, I believe the world would be safer, healthier and happier. And isn't that what all of you want?
Together as a society we can make a change. All we need is teamwork and a strong voice to put an end to smoking. Everything you have will someday be gone. So take pictures and hide them in your memories so you can recall them later after everything that is becomes everything that was. We ignore the ones who adore us, adore the ones who ignore us, love the ones who hurt us, and hurt the ones that love us. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? These links will automatically appear in your email.
If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. We try to make TeenInk. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it.
Don't have an account? Sign up for one. In Holland, dealers who operate illegally are criminally charged, while all drug use is allowed to people over the age of Here, drug use is controlled with the set daily limit of 5 grams. But should all drugs really be legal? Is the right move to legalize only marijuana or should we put a stop on forbidding people to use any type of drug?
The fact is, marijuana is not nearly as dangerous as other drugs such as cocaine. Still, how come marijuana is forbidden for use and other dangerous prescribed drugs are not? As with any other important subject, marijuana legalization also comes with many pros and cons, the biggest con being the negative impact this drug has on the health of people. According to this belief, smoking any substance can have a bad effect on the IQ, memory, problem-solving skills and increase the chances of mental illnesses.
However, there are very few facts that confirm the latest claim. Actually, the health benefits are one of the 3 reasons why marijuanas should be legal, according to the proponents of the idea.
Additionally, there are certain health benefits that come from using cannabis, which is why there is such thing as medical marijuanas. Marijuana used for medicinal purposes is known to reduce glaucoma and help people go through chemo. According to an article by Discovery Health, marijuana is also known to relieve nausea and have a certain effect on the brain.
What you might not have noticed is that this study also included IQ measurements at ages 7 — 13, and the change from age IQ and age 38 IQ was slightly positive basically zero for nonusers and slightly negative basically zero for light users. On the other hand, the study also showed that heavy use defined as at least 4 days per week does have a significant negative effect.
So no, he did report the results of that paper accurately. It was a formatting error — here is the unbroken link. Oh and thanks for helping source that broken link. The Dutch started tolerating coffeeshops in My question to the author: Why bother citing it when this is nearly useless data? This is a troll blog at best, or this guy just believes that if he throws in enough blue links people will believe whatever he writes.
Hell, if everyone was one-fifth as conscientious as Scott when it comes to this, the world would already be much better off. Because the study they are referring to showed as much as an 8 point drop in IQ. In my opinion that is very insignificant. Scientifically the Standard Deviation is 15 points, so even science does not consider 8 points a big deal. In reality, they look very silly using an 8 point drop as a reason to prohibit Cannabis, if one realizes 8 points is a statistical drop in the ocean.
I smoke daily, multiple times a day, for 18 years. I am the Senior Network Engineer at my job. As usual, I call bullshit on these sorts of exaggerated analysis, just that no one but the choir are listening. Half a standard deviation is huge. Most effects aspire to hit one day hit as high as a d of 0. For comparison, Ashkenazi Jews vs whites is a similar size, as is iodized vs iodine-deficient. This is an exaggerated analysis. If you wish to contest the accepted standard deviation for IQ scoring, then you should publish a paper on it.
Do you even understand science or are you pretending? Anonymous is correct, you are giving an exaggerated analysis. So if 15 is typical in a population, why is 8 significant? Am I the only one here who understands this concept? So with that now understood, if there is a standard deviation of 15 points from the average score under normal circumstances, then 8 points for a heavy cannabis user is indeed insignificant compared to the standard deviation.
Er, a standard deviation is indeed a measure of variance from the average. That said, a standard deviation is a pretty huge number in absolute terms and is in no way connected to what is statistically significant. Are you telling me that you would score exactly the same on two seperate IQ testings, one given to you in the morning and a different one given to you at night?
Or possibily 30, depending on how one parses the parent comment. Make sure you nail that down before the bet is official. So, I actually did some research on marijuana use and IQ a few years ago using rats as models.
Extremely heavy use was required to cause IQ damage in rats, and the rats had to be adolescent. There was some IQ lose associated with use for adults during and shortly after, but that disappeared within a reasonable amount of time. So in relation to IQ lose in teens, the question is what constitutes heavy use and do all studies use the same metric?
The maximum is seldom helpful. Do people really need twenty hours of lawyer time just to defend against marijuana possession charges? The look on the faces of a classroom of social work students, who are mostly year-old women, when the professor mentions that schizophrenia usually manifests age in women, is priceless.
Has severe trauma, for example child abuse, significantly declined over the last 50 years? If so, that could easily explain the drop in schizophrenia. Any effects from marijuana use could easily be overwhelmed by such societal changes.
But any historical data coming from before intercoder reliability was regularly and carefully evaluated should be firmly ignored. Surely mopishness is depression, not schizophrenia? The medieval concept mapping the strongest to schizophrenia is probably demonic possession. Our previous government tried to change our coffee shops from stores to private clubs with a fixed limit to the amount of members, excluding tourists and casual users from the ability to legally purchase drugs.
Right from the start the amount of drug dealers on the street skyrocketed I have no numbers at hand, but this is acknowledged by both citizen accounts and statements by police officials and mayors.
Coffee shops can sell, but can not buy their product legally, and nobody can legally grow weed to sell to the shops. There is a lot of drug related crime in the growing and distributing of drugs. I can not remember a case of a drug raid by police where they did not find an arsenal of firearms which are mostly prohibited here , and the amount of drugs they find suggest a huge income for organized crime.
Landsburg has critiqued the point about tax revenues. Consider the large variation between countries in terms of alcohol, smoking, unhealthy food, dangerous driving to give just a few examples. For instance, Japan has very little obesity and hard drug problems, but smoking is around 4 times more common than in Norway though probably is declining.
My sense is that binge drinking and alcoholism varies substantially between countries. The cost of drinking may be reflected in how permissive the laws are, but only imperfectly. One important aspect is how legalization affects use of more dangerous drugs.
A small impact on number of hard drug users may be a big QALY cost. Most of the stuff published for public consumption is dishonest and hacktastic; your efforts are appreciated, at least by me. What is the matter with Mary Jane? The IQ study is far from conclusive. The results of the Meier et al. IQ study were already brought into question:.
A simulation of the confounding model reproduces the reported associations from the [August study], suggesting that the causal effects estimated in Meier et al. Correlations between cannabis use and IQ change in the Dunedin cohort are consistent with confounding from socioeconomic status. It can take longer for effects to wear off in such users [Fried.
If marijuana caused psychosis then the overall rates of psychosis should have risen with rising usage rates of marijuana in the U. Also rates of psychosis should vary by country depending on their marijuana usage rate but they do not. They are roughly the same throughout the world.
It can even help people with schizophrenia. The effects of cannabis use on neurocognition in schizophrenia: During this time I taught myself software development and obtained a job at a university armed only with a highschool diploma. The theory that crazy people self-select as drug users cannot be stressed enough. A few points about the gateway drug effect: There is definitely a class of people who just try things and lsd is substantially safer than hang gliding.
At minimum you need to include only participants who started with a chronic cannabis habit and developed an additional chronic habit. I would also seriously consider segregating users who moved on only to psychadelics such as lsd, mushrooms, peyote, ayahuasca and salvia divinorum.
There is definitely a distinct class who smokes marijuana and uses these drugs, occasionally or heavily, but would never consider even trying cocaine, opiates, amphetamines, etc. Aside from mushrooms, the psychadelic drugs are relatively safe and are simply used for reasons separate than the reasons explaining heroine use.
Exploring the gateway drug effect brings us instantly into contact with the question of which other drugs should be scrutinized for potential decriminalization or legalization — but we can improve our statistics by selecting a few of these drugs and seeing whether this class can emerge from clinically feasible samples.
Anecdotally I could put you onto a full contiguous city block of them, all middle class. From the link you provided: Studies in several localities have found that approximately 4 to 14 percent of drivers who sustained injury or died in traffic accidents tested positive for THC. Perhaps though this merely points to the blindingly obvious fact that people who smoke weed often drive slower and more carefully than average to avoid being pulled over — a fact which will disappear with legalization.
No, this effect of greater caution has been demonstrated in the lab were there is no fear of being pulled over. Another way THC seems to differ qualitatively from many other drugs is that the formers users seem better able to compensate for its adverse effects while driving under the influence.
THC did not impair driving performance yet the subjects thought it had. If it is plausible that MJ has a substitution effect with alcohol to the point where it reduces road fatalities appreciably… Surely it is plausible that it also has some sort of mitigating substitution effect with the IQ-reduction effect of alcohol.
I wonder if the IQ differences are constant across IQ range? Also, how does it depend on when the weed was smoked? At what age is IQ no longer affected by smoking pot? The main problem with the legality is that it is so hard to answer these questions right now when there is so little data.
If we had accurate information, at least we could form public policy intelligently and inform the public of the risks. Giving What We Can is a charitable movement promoting giving some of your money to the developing world or other worthy causes. If you're interested in this, consider taking their Pledge as a formal and public declaration of intent. Support this blog by donating through Patreon. We start with a presentation of a summary of the article, and then discuss in a friendly atmosphere.
Metaculus is a platform for generating crowd-sourced predictions about the future, especially science and technology.
If you're interested in testing yourself and contributing to their project, check out their questions page. Beeminder's an evidence-based willpower augmention tool that collects quantifiable data about your life, then helps you organize it into commitment mechanisms so you can keep resolutions.
They've also got a blog about what they're doing here. Triplebyte is building an objective and empirically validated software engineering recruitment process. We invite you to test your skills and try our process! The Effective Altruism newsletter provides monthly updates on the highest-impact ways to do good and help others. Their free career guide show you how to choose a career that's fulfilling and maximises your contribution to solving the world's most pressing problems.
Nectome is building the first brain preservation technique to verifiably preserve your memories for the future. Jane Street is a quantitative trading firm with a focus on technology and collaborative problem solving. We're always hiring talented programmers, traders, and researchers and have internships and fulltime positions in New York, London, and Hong Kong.
No background in finance required. MealSquares is a "nutritionally complete" food that contains a balanced diet worth of nutrients in a few tasty easily measurable units. Altruisto is a browser extension so that when you shop online, a portion of the money you pay goes to effective charities no extra cost to you.
Just install an extension and when you buy something, people in poverty will get medicines, bed nets, or financial aid. Or the studies are wrong. Studies being wrong is always a pretty good bet. Is Marijuana Bad For You?
There are not really that many people in jail for using marijuana. An Irresponsible Utilitarian Analysis Decriminalization and legalization of medical marijuana seem, if we are to trust the statistics in I saying they do not increase use among youth, like almost unalloyed good things.
So here is my guess at the yearly results of marijuana legalization: Now our accounting is: Net benefits from legalization: So my actual conclusion is: So my actual actual conclusion is: This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged long post is long , medicine , much more than you wanted to know , psychiatry , utilitarianism.
January 5, at 4: January 5, at 5: January 5, at 6: January 6, at January 11, at 6: January 6, at 2: Yeah, that makes me think of the statistics on mother-reported virgin births.
January 5, at 7: January 6, at 5: The comment above makes the same point. They must have replied whist I was reading the post. This clashes with my intuition. For horrible-but-existent data on this, I googled site:
The number of people pointing out to the numerous reasons why marijuana should be legal is growing daily. It is exactly in March of that the AP-NORC Center for Public.
Why Marijuana Should Be Legal Are you writing an essay or working on a speech or presentation about why marijuana should be legal? If so, this page is for you.
If you want to achieve anything in life, it’s time to stop smoking pot. This advice runs quite contrary to the current popular culture. Recreational marijuana use has gone mainstream in the past few years as various states have legalized its use. Free argumentative essay on why kids should get vaccines papers, essays, and research papers.
Sources for marijuana legalization policy discussion and research. Articles, reports, publications and books about marijuana and legalization. Why marijuana should be legal. February When we were in junior high school, my friend Rich and I made a map of the school lunch tables according to popularity. This was easy to do, because kids only ate lunch with others of .