Only a fraction of the more than two hundred year history of public debates in Congress are captured by the Congressional Record and its predecessors—and even then, the record is selective and incomplete. In addition, the official and private papers of Members of Congress are not typically preserved, published, or widely available when archived. More problematic for this inquiry, the interpretation of Presidential papers remains more an art than a science, as students of the Presidency have developed few standardized methods that apply easily across time or individual.
This methodological deficiency seems inconsequential for individual biographical studies, yet its effects are not necessarily insignificant. One historian, for example, associated the reformist impulses of President Rutherford B.
The portrait of Hayes clearly captures elements of his personality and historical era, but other biographical commentaries and the 5-volume Diary and Letters of Rutherford Birchard Hayes—the first published diary of a U.
Similar interpretative problematics plague the analysis of other Presidential papers. Eisenhower include few and primarily incidental references to the Declaration of Independence; and yet, it would be incorrect to infer neither President used or was affected by the Declaration.
Given these qualifications, the remainder of this essay employs two complementary approaches in an attempt to illuminate different elements of the substantive relationship between the Declaration of Independence and the individuals who have served in Congress and the Presidency.
Part I identifies several general principles of the Declaration that are prominently although inconsistently reflected throughout the historical development of both national institutions. This first approach allows us to recognize the general ways by which Members of Congress and U. Presidents have participated within—and therefore, have been influenced by—a political context and tradition whose framework and principles were first articulated in the Declaration of Independence.
General Principles Although many conditions and individuals contributed directly to the formation and subsequent development of Congress and the U.
Presidency, several ideas articulated in the Declaration have been consistent and, more important, prior sources of influence upon these institutions. The first and perhaps most obscure idea and influences is derived from the ways in which the Declaration characterizes the world and human nature.
These premises identify dependent relationships between the attributes of the world and of human nature and their prior and singular, shared cause. The second relationship is between a set of human qualities and their divine creative origin.
This idea manifested itself in several ways. These ideals have been the common, unexamined expectations of many Members of Congress, Presidents and the American people up to the present day, but they represent noteworthy breaks from mainstream eighteenth-century political thought and the context of American colonial experiences under British rule, which privileged the ideas, institutions and practices of imperialism, colonialism, monarchical will, and Parliamentary sovereignty.
This original endorsement initiated a constitutional tradition within which many Members of Congress and U. Presidents have subsequently participated—a tradition that permits and encourages conceptions and pursuits of legal, political and social alternatives to the status quo. The details and consequences of these influences require little rehearsal because they appear as integral parts of both the Articles of Confederation and the U.
The final general influence of the Declaration of Independence upon Congress and U. Presidents is reflected in its support and promotion of a democratic political culture. In numerous localities, the first public reading of the Declaration of Independence prompted public celebrations— no doubt, forerunners of subsequent Fourth of July celebrations in which the American people, Members of Congress, U.
Presidents, and others have publicly commemorated the anniversary of the Declaration. The Declaration and its annual celebrations also furthered the development of an activist democratic political culture once social groups and individuals including political candidates recognized the derivative rhetorical and political opportunities associated with these public events.
Since at least , the Declaration and the Fourth of July have been prominent parts of American civic discourses, political campaigns, and the beginning of many political careers, including U. Representative and Senator Daniel Webster whose early public speaking reputation began and grew with every Fourth of July speech he gave Remini, ; Waldstreicher, ; Burstein, Historical Uses of the Declaration of Independence In addition to the identified general influences of the Declaration of Independence upon the U.
For the sake of analytical clarity, these historical particulars are organized and presented below in four chronological eras. The first era extends from to ; the second from to; the third from to ; and the fourth era from to Morris, who considered it premature, put his signature as well. A number of signatures T.
Thornton appeared much later on 2d of August. The names of all 56 people who signed the Declaration are encrypted in the US history. The extensive literature and the memorial in Washington were dedicated for them. In the famous painting by J. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, is now presented for viewing in the exhibition hall.
The day of the adoption of the Declaration on July, 4th has become a national holiday in the U. Rely on professional writers with your college paper and take a load off your mind.
The 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence, what was to become one of the most important and influential documents in history, agreed to "mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor. Fundamentally the Declaration of Independence is at the same time. The word 'liberation' brings to mind exuberant people bathing in the luxury of freedom, away from the weight of controls and obligations set upon them, enjoying their natural rights. Liberation for all citizens of the United States of America is commonly believed to have been established by the Declaration of Independence, being written in order to separate the colonies from the British Crown, and.
Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence in Its purpose was to declare the 13 colonies in America free and independent from Great Britain, get other colonists on board, and to encourage other nations to help them.
Analysis of the Declaration of Independence Essay Words | 5 Pages. Analysis of The Declaration of Independence The Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson was made in order to give the colonists a way to break free from the shackles of King George.
Declaration Of Independence The Declaration of Independence is a document that was written by the continental congress and tommas Jefferson in perticular to the king of england and the english parlament. It was written as a statement to the english that .
In conclusion, the declaration of independence is a document that jump-started the United States. It explains why they had to the right to separate from Great Britain, and many unjust actions they inflicted upon the colonies. The declaration is a very thorough complex document that would not worked in . - Summation of the Declaration of Independence The Declaration of Independence, composed in Congress, on July 4, , was not only a statement displaying the rights of the governed, but was a declaration of why the thirteen states of the United States was separating themselves from Great Britain.
Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more. Get started now! The Declaration of Independence can be divided into four parts. The first part is an introduction which explains why the colonies wished to declare their independence, and the necessity of independence for a successful new country.