In a new Anzac Day Act was passed, allowing sport and entertainment in the afternoon. From the s, but especially in the s and s, Anzac Day became increasingly controversial in both Australia and New Zealand. Protests against the Vietnam War were common Anzac Day occurrences during the s and s. They were subsequently convicted of disorderly conduct.
In , a women's group laid a wreath dedicated to all the women raped and killed during war, and movements for feminism, gay rights, and peace used the occasion to draw attention to their respective causes at various times during the s. Following Australia's involvement in the Vietnam War, interest in Anzac Day reached its lowest point. Australians and New Zealanders recognise 25 April as a ceremonial occasion to reflect on the cost of war and to remember those who fought and lost their lives for their country.
Commemorative services and marches are held at dawn, the time of the original landing, mainly at war memorials in cities and towns across both nations and the sites of some of Australia and New Zealand's more-recognised battles and greatest losses, such as Villers-Bretonneux in France  and Gallipoli in Turkey. One of the traditions of Anzac Day is the " gunfire breakfast " coffee with rum added which occurs shortly after many dawn ceremonies, and recalls the "breakfast" taken by many soldiers before facing battle.
Later in the day, ex-servicemen and ex-servicewomen meet and join in marches through the major cities and many smaller centres. In , female veterans were encouraged to march at the front of their sections. The By The Left initiative was launched following a number of reported cases where servicewomen had been challenged that they were wearing their medals on the wrong side, as people should wear their own medals on the left side of their chest, but people marching in place of their parents or other ancestors should wear that person's medals on the right side.
After the First World War, returned soldiers sought the comradeship they felt in those quiet, peaceful moments before dawn. With symbolic links to the dawn landing at Gallipoli, a dawn stand-to or dawn ceremony became a common form of Anzac Day remembrance during the s.
The first official dawn service was held at the Sydney Cenotaph in Dawn services were originally very simple and followed the operational ritual; in many cases they were restricted to veterans only.
The daytime ceremony was for families and other well-wishers and the dawn service was for returned soldiers to remember and reflect among the comrades with whom they shared a special bond. Before dawn the gathered veterans would be ordered to "stand-to" and two minutes of silence would follow. At the start of this time a lone bugler would play the Last Post and then concluded the service with Reveille. In more recent times the families and young people have been encouraged to take part in dawn services, and services in Australian capital cities have seen some of the largest turnouts ever.
Reflecting this change, the ceremonies have become more elaborate, incorporating hymns, readings, pipers and rifle volleys. Others, though, have retained the simple format of the dawn stand-to, familiar to so many soldiers. Typical modern dawn services follow a pattern that is now familiar to generations of Australians, containing the following features: At the Australian War Memorial, following events such as the Anzac Day and Remembrance Day services, families often place artificial red poppies beside the names of relatives on the Memorial's Roll of Honour.
In Australia, sprigs of rosemary are often worn on lapels  and in New Zealand poppies have taken on this role. In Australia and New Zealand, Anzac Day commemoration features solemn "Dawn Services" or "Dawn Marches", a tradition started in Albany, Western Australia on 25 April and now held at war memorials around both countries, accompanied by thoughts of those lost at war to the ceremonial sounds of the Last Post on the bugle.
The fourth stanza of Laurence Binyon 's poem For the Fallen known as the " Ode of Remembrance ", or simply as "the Ode" is often recited. Anzac Day is a national public holiday and is considered by many Australians to be one of the most solemn days of the year.
Marches by veterans from all past wars, as well as current serving members of the Australian Defence Force and Reserves, with allied veterans as well as the Australian Defence Force Cadets and Australian Air League and supported by members of Scouts Australia , Guides Australia , and other service groups, are held in cities and towns nationwide. The Anzac Day March from each state capital is televised live with commentary.
These events are generally followed by social gatherings of veterans, hosted either in a public house or in an RSL club, often including a traditional Australian gambling game called two-up , which was an extremely popular pastime with ANZAC soldiers.
In most Australian states and territories, gambling is forbidden outside of licensed venues. However, due to the significance of this tradition, two-up is legal only on Anzac Day. Despite federation being proclaimed in Australia in , it is argued that the "national identity" of Australia was largely forged during the violent conflict of World War I,   and the most iconic event in the war for most Australians was the landing at Gallipoli.
Paul Skrebels of the University of South Australia has noted that Anzac Day has continued to grow in popularity;  even the threat of a terrorist attack at the Gallipoli site in  did not deter some 15, Australians from making the pilgrimage to Turkey to commemorate the fallen ANZAC troops.
Although commemoration events are always held on 25 April, most states and territories currently observe a substitute public holiday on the following Monday when Anzac Day falls on a Sunday.
Australia Post has issued stamps over the years to commemorate Anzac Day, the first being in for the 20th anniversary of the Gallipoli landings. The list of issued stamps includes: During many wars, Australian rules football matches have been played overseas in places like northern Africa, Vietnam, and Iraq as a celebration of Australian culture and as a bonding exercise between soldiers. The modern-day tradition began in and is played every year between traditional AFL rivals Collingwood and Essendon at the Melbourne Cricket Ground.
This annual match is often considered the biggest of the AFL season outside of the finals, sometimes drawing bigger crowds than all but the Grand Final ,  and often selling out in advance. A record crowd of 94, people attended the inaugural match in Collingwood hold the advantage 11 wins to 8 with one draw in the inaugural year, The trophy was named after two notable Anzac soldiers: From , the Anzac Test , a rugby league test match, has commemorated Anzac Day, though it is typically played prior to Anzac Day.
The match is always played between the Australian and New Zealand national teams, and has drawn attendances of between 20, and 45, in the past.
The final Anzac test occurred in Domestically, matches have been played on Anzac Day since with occasional exceptions. New Zealand's Commemoration of Anzac Day  is similar. For some, the day adds weight to the idea that war is futile. Anzac Day now promotes a sense of unity, perhaps more effectively than any other day on the national calendar.
People whose politics, beliefs and aspirations are widely different can nevertheless share a genuine sorrow at the loss of so many lives in war. Paper poppies are widely distributed by the Returned Services Association and worn as symbols of remembrance. This tradition follows that of the wearing of poppies on Remembrance Sunday in other Commonwealth countries. The day is a public holiday in New Zealand. A prior Act passed in prevented the holiday from being "Mondayised" moved to the 26th or 27th should the 25th fall on a weekend ,  although this drew criticism from trade unionists and Labour Party politicians.
New Zealand's reason for having Anzac Day as its national commemoration day is different to Australia. The RSA was stuck with the cost of , of these French made poppies and to get its money returned quickly it chose the next commemoration date available to sell them — Dardanelles Day, 25 April This date then stuck in the psyche of New Zealanders ever since.
New Zealand did copy Australia in having dawn services 16 years later, despite New Zealand not landing at dawn at Gallipoli. Attempts have been made to revert to Armistice Day, commencing with the "Tomb for the Unknown Warrior" parade in But New Zealanders have resisted, unaware of its history.
The reason for some wanting to revert is that other bigger battles and losses have since been ignored. The Gallipoli Dawn Service was held at the Ari Burnu War Cemetery at Anzac Cove, but the growing numbers of people attending resulted in the construction of a more spacious site on North Beach, known as the "Anzac Commemorative Site" in time for the year service.
A ballot was held to allocate passes for Australians and New Zealanders wishing to attend Anzac Day commemorations at Gallipoli in Of the 10, people that could be safely, securely and comfortably accommodated at the Anzac Commemorative Site, in this comprised places for 8, Australians, 2, New Zealanders and official representatives of all nations involved in the Gallipoli campaign.
Only those who received an offer of attendance passes attended the commemorations in From the beginning, there has been concern to protect the Anzac tradition from inappropriate use.
For decades, there have been concerns that the participation of young people in Anzac Day events has injected a carnival element into what is traditionally a solemn occasion. The change was highlighted by a rock concert-style performance at the Anzac Cove commemoration during which attendees drank and slept between headstones.
After the event the site was left strewn with rubbish. Over recent years, some historians and commentators have raised concerns over what they see as the increasing commercialisation of Anzac Day. In , historian Dr Carolyn Holbrook stated that companies were seeking to associate themselves with Anzac Day as "Anzac is the most potent and popular brand going around in Australia today". Many of the products associated with the centenary of the Gallipoli landings were also commercial failures.
Anzac Day has been criticised by a number of Australians and New Zealanders. In the play, Anzac Day is critiqued by the central character, Hughie, as a day of drunken debauchery by returned soldiers and as a day when questions of what it means to be loyal to a nation or Empire must be raised.
The play was scheduled to be performed at the inaugural Adelaide Festival of Arts , but after complaints from the Returned Services League , the governors of the Festival refused permission for this to occur. In October , former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating stated that he believes it is misguided for people to gather each year at Anzac Cove to commemorate the landing at Gallipoli, because it is "utter and complete nonsense" to suggest that the nation was "born again or even, redeemed there.
Some critics have suggested that the revival in public interest in Anzac Day amongst the young results from the fact that younger Australians have not themselves experienced war. Other criticisms have revolved around a perceived overzealousness in Australian attachment to the event, either from participants unaware of the loss or when the focus is at the expense of remembrance of the contribution of New Zealand. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This section needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. April Learn how and when to remove this template message. Australia portal New Zealand portal. Archived from the original on 1 May Retrieved 24 April New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage. Archived from the original on 27 April Retrieved 22 April Retrieved 2 May Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs.
Archived from the original PDF on 13 March Retrieved 8 April Archived from the original on 2 February Retrieved 15 January The New Zealand Journal of History.
Archived from the original on 25 March Retrieved 25 March The New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original on 17 February Retrieved 17 February Archived from the original on 23 August Archived from the original on 30 December Retrieved 30 December Retrieved 16 June Canon Garland Memorial Society. Archived from the original on 1 March Garland, David John — Archived from the original on 4 March Stumbling Through the Past. Archived from the original on 5 March Archived from the original on 3 October Ninety Years of Service".
Archived from the original on 8 March To Kokoda and Beyond Second ed. Crows Nest, New South Wales: ANZAC day, sadly in my opinion, has become a festival. Should more be made of this without the article becoming too weaselly? After last years commemorations at Anzac Cove were a bit of a party, this years one was much more sombre. They banned alcohol and there wasn't a concert. With the change in attitude at the Anzac Cove commemorations is the last sentence under the Australian heading any longer correct?
If it is, I do think it should be referenced, surely if the statement was true then there would be a citable media comment agreeing with it. Australia's 'worst war catastrophe'? Anzac Day is held on the day of the initial Allied landings on the Gallipoli Peninsula, but to state that this was "Australia's worst war catastrophe" is conjecture and many would not agree.
Over the eight months from the Landing till the Evacuation, Australia lost around soldiers killed. Many more died on the Western Front over the same time period.
I attended the dawn service this year at the AWM, I was surprised at how Christian the service was Hymns, prayers, most of the speakers were defence force chaplins etc. How about New Zealand? Should the christian tone of the commomeration be mentioned in the article? It is also important to note that in New Zealand we don't refer to a Dawn Service, but rather a Dawn Parade, it is much more secular and the chaplins are nowhere near as prominent in their role.
I first attended an Australian style Service a few years ago in Jakarta and I was a little bit unnerved by the heavy religious slant as compared to the NZ Dawn Parade, which I attended every year when at home in NZ. So I think the article should reflect this major difference. There is a Wikipedia: If you would like to express an opinion on this proposed move please follow the link to Talk: Gallipoli -- Philip Baird Shearer Wouldn't it be valuable to readers to add the links to these movie and documentary about Gallipoli?
They wear rosemary in Australia, though the article doesn't mention it. I remember being taught that this was because of the rosemary growing on the shores of Gallipoli, but a look at the wiki page for rosemary says that it's often used for remembrance. Any sources either way?
Okay, I guess there's this- http: The reason is one of those quirks of history: The decision nonetheless established an historic precedence whereby Poppy Day — as the day was known from the outset — became forever associated with ANZAC Day in New Zealand, thus setting it apart from the rest of the world where it is largely associated with Armistice Day.
I just read this article and it seems to be rather bias towards Australia. Could New Zealand have more of a feature in this article? Will try and get some images of the service in Wellington tomorrow. Are these people Pathfinders or Scouts and should this be said instead of just Troop review on the image caption. Ans e ll The first paragraph of the article makes it sound like Anzac day is only about remembering those involved with the Gallipoli landing.
The day is actually about remembering those who have fought in any war. That can't be denied. Over time its meaning has changed but that doesn't change its origins nor its focus. Anzac Day began as a remembrance of those who had fought at Gallipoli but has come to be a day of thanks for all those Australians who fought in conflicts.
It is now the national day of remembrance, Nov 11 has become relatively un-important. Nowaydays sorrowfully it is largely ignored. I have corrected this. The Anzac Day dawn service was held at Ari Burnu Cemetery within the cove until when the number of people attending outgrew the site. A purpose built "Anzac Commemorative Site" was constructed nearby on North Beach in time for the service.
It's quite ironic that under "criticisms" there is a massive, wikipedia-produced, glorifisation at the end: This has largely been seen as the younger generations of Australia wanting to honour their family connections to the sacrifices made by the previous generations.
I'm referring to the last sentence But any other word derived from the acronym is just that - a word, and should not be fully capitalised, as per the discussion above. The soldiers were known as 'Anzacs'. The holiday is 'Anzac Day'. The cove is 'Anzac Cove'.
The sector of Gallipoli is the 'Anzac sector ' as opposed to the Helles and Suvla sectors. There are literally thousands of primary source documents and other material proving this.
I am unable to move the page myself due to the Anzac Day page having a history attached to it. As per the discussions above, I propose to move the page from ANZAC Day to Anzac Day , as the non-capitalised version is the commonly accepted version by the general public, and also in Australian and New Zealand legislation. Monash initiated the initial ANZAC day and was one of the principal organisers after the war and yet gets no mention in the article?
Despite the objections of the few, Anzac Day now draws record crowds. Right, I happen to be a part of this 'younger generation of Australia', celebrate ANZAC Day every year and do it as much 'honour' as any of the best do, and yet have no 'family connections' to any of these particular sacrifices. Who wants to reword this? Take the tone of racism out of it, yeah? The 'younger generations of Australia' are not composed primarily of people that have particular 'family connections' to ANZAC Day, yet obviously a significant amount of youth commemorate it with a decent amount of respect - where do 'family connections' fit into THAT?
This sort of thing doesn't belong here - it doesn't represent the 'younger generations of Australia', unfortunately many would prefer it to, but Wikipedia shouldn't have that breeching of neutrality. Keep the bit about the sacrifices, the honour, the younger generations, but this 'family connections' stuff should be firmly disposed of. See this extract from the page from the Australian National War Memorial. In London over 2, Australian and New Zealand troops marched through the streets.
A London newspaper headline dubbed them "The knights of Gallipoli". Marches were held all over Australia in Wounded soldiers from Gallipoli attended the Sydney march in convoys of cars, attended by nurses. For the remaining years of the war, ANZAC Day was used as an occasion for patriotic rallies and recruiting campaigns, and parades of serving members of the AIF were held in most cities. By the mids all the rituals we today associate with the day — dawn vigils, marches, memorial services, reunions, two-up games — were firmly established as part of ANZAC Day culture.
In subsequent years the meaning of the day has been further broadened to include Australians killed in all the military operations in which Australia has been involved. ANZAC Day was first commemorated at the Memorial in but, due to government orders preventing large public gatherings in case of Japanese air attack, it was a small affair and was neither a march nor a memorial service.
Commemorative services are held at dawn — the time of the original landing — across the nation. Later in the day, ex-servicemen and women meet and join in marches through the major cities and many smaller centres. Commemorative ceremonies are held at war memorials around the country. It is a day when Australians reflect on the many different meanings of war.
As a proud Australian could you please correct your definition on Wikipedia. Also the amount of space you give to the criticism of ANZAC Day at the end of the article is out of proportion with the reality here in Australia.
Very few people are critical of this national day and while I acknowledge there will be some criticism - the amount of commentary you allow in the article is not in proportion with actual sentiment here in this country. After going through the article I've made a couple of structural changes.
I also moved an image of a person marching from the criticism section as its not associated with that section, given that the person is readily identifiable it raises concerns under WP: BLP , that section should only have a protest type image. Reading this section I dont think has given undue weight , the comments by DR Martin Ball could be removed especially the quote as its a conglomerate of comments made within a media opinion piece.
To move forward to GA the references need to be cleaned up, there are still three EL that are linked within the text these need to be changed to citation or moved to a EL section.
This section is needing some more attention as it doesnt differentiate between what is Criticism of the day, what it means etc. Where as events like in Turkey are more news items related to a specific location, rather actual criticisms of the day in general.
In , the issue of allowing conscientious objectors to march was raised in New Zealand, with Peace Action Wellington saying that "conscientious objectors are the real heroes of Anzac Day, which An 'undue weight' tag has been added to the "criticism, protests and controversies" section. This section, as currently written, covers three main themes:.
It is unclear which of these three themes the 'undue weight' tag is intended to apply to. The undue weight policy states that:. Articles that compare views should not give minority views as much or as detailed a description as more popular views, and will generally not include tiny-minority views at all.
A range of reliable source materials -- both mainstream press pieces and academic articles -- have been provided as citations for the information in this section.
If it is alleged that any or all of the three themes listed above are "minority views", then the "majority view" must be thoroughly documented and backed with reliable sources in the article. Currently, this "majority view" is not even identified, much less sourced.
Until this is done, the information in the section, as presently written, must stay. Firstly, which of the views I have summarised them into three main themes above do you consider to be tiny-minority? Just one, or all three? Secondly, if you want to remove the current well-referenced views, you must first be able to demonstrate that they are tiny-minority views.
The only way of doing this is to show that there exists a contrary majority view or views which have been published by reliable sources.
As the undue weight policy make clear "if a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts. Presumably, if you think the views are tiny-minority, you must be aware of the existence of contrary majority view of views. If so, what are they, and what reliable sources are there to show this? The first two paragraphs look good.
I am a little hazy about some of your edits to the rest. If anything, the edited version has added weasel words, such as "Critics contend", "Other critics have suggested". Wikipedia's policy on weasel words specifically identifies phrases such as these as ones to be avoided.
Is there a reason the names of the people making the various criticisms have been removed? I agree that it reads better now thanks to your good work, but I fear that someone will simply come along and place "weasel word" tags throughout the section, as has already happened once before to this page. I will not change your edit for now, pending your response other than removing the undue weight tag.
Those heroes that shed their blood And lost their lives. You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies And the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side Here in this country of ours.
You, the mothers, Who sent their sons from far away countries Wipe away your tears, Your sons are now lying in our bosom And are in peace After having lost their lives on this land they have Become our sons as well.
The above monolith was unveiled in when the Turkish Government officially renamed the area "Anzac Koyu". Mehmetchik is a common term for a Turkish soldier similar to "Johnnies", "Tommy"or "Digger". I found this at http: In the text, is "first official dawn service" seen as to mean, recognised as the first dawn service or the first dawn service to be sanction by the government? I ask because, it was not the first dawn service and the defence department would agree. Opps, i made this post last week.
Forgot to tag it. I have my concerns about the criticism section of this article. Firstly, "criticism" sections appears to be discouraged by Wikipedia: Criticism admittedly only an essay and that "information should be properly incorporated throughout the article rather than having a troll magnet section of random criticisms". The section uses weasel word terms such as "some critics". Any statements of opinion should be named per WP: The section bears the hallmarks of " a coatrack ".
Large chunks of the section seem to be more concerned about John Howard and his supposed indoctrination of the Australian populace than about how Anzac Day is actually perceived by the public. All of the criticism of Howard is entirely opinion albeit cited and of dubious use in this article. I am not suggesting that this article should not cover the diverse range of opinion about Anzac Day.
In addition, the commemoration services have been used by various groups from varying groups on all sides of the political spectrum as a venue to attract attention to their particular causes and there is some cause to include some discussion of this in an NPOV manner. However, the section as it stands gives undue weight to opinion critical of Anzac Day, seems to be more about attacking political opponents than talking about the day and serves to act as a grab-bag of everything negative that has been said or done about or during the day.
The best course of action is remove the section entirely, distribute the relevant material throughout the article and remove the coatracking material and the material that is mere opinion. I've taken the bold step and changed the image over for comparison the one on the left is the new image I took this morning at the dawn service in Perth, the image I replaced is the on the right which was taken at the AWM in Canberra in IMHO the new images is better in the detail and more reflective of sunrise rather then the old image which looks like a dark square with white dots.
Since the image is of AWM and from the 90th anniversery service it has a stronger historical connection then the new one I open the change up for discussion. Over all some thought needs to be given to choice and placement of images in this article. This use of the word is unknown in the US, so I have added a brief explanation in parens to its first use in the article, with a link to the Wikipedia definition:. I think that it is incorrect to describe it as a "half holiday" in New Zealand.
The half-day restriction is part of the Shop Trading hours act. The afternoon of Anzac day is stiill a public holiday - banks and all non-retail businessed are closed and public holiday pay rates are enforced. The fact that shops are open in the afternoon is irrelevant, just as the shops may open on other public holidays such as Queen's Birthday, Labour Day, New year's day etc.
Clearly they do have some sort of relevence to this day, according to the Wikipedia article itself. I just tried following the external link to the Commemorative Australian site, but the page no longer exists. I don't have an editing account, could someone please fix it? An alternative might be this: I would like the inclusion of the following paragraph to recognise that in there are commemoration ceremonies held in Singapore for ANZAC Day:.
Kranji was the site of the landing beach head for Japanese soldiers during the Battle for Singapore in early , following their invasion of Malaya and routing of Australian and British and Allied troops, The Kranji Commonwealth War cemetery has been the location for ANZAC Dawn Services ever since liberation in What section is this supposed to go under? Spitfire 19 Talk It's a tiny minority view not deserving of a mention. What sort of filthy animals say that?
I notice that the New Zealand section includes with my emphasis added here:. A prior Act passed in prevents the holiday from being "Mondayised" celebrated on the 26th or 27th should the 25th fall on a weekend. In some parts of Australia one would be severely chastised for suggesting that Anzac Day was "celebrated". War is a very bad thing and should not "celebrated".
Perhaps the New Zealanders think differently, but I suspect that we should reword that sentence to say "commemorated" instead of "celebrated". I'm an Australian, not offended by the terminology, who thinks Anzac Day is vastly overrated. Yes, war is bad, but let's get over it. Mitch Ames talk I've changed it to the more neutral "moved to the 26th or 27th" - we don't actually care what they do on the day - what's important here is when they do it. Though it will 'age' quickly, possibly useful for expatriates?
I've renamed this section to avoid confusion with an earlier section. I didn't hear about too much criticism and protest on Anzac Day It's like the idea of sovereign aboriginal states carved out of Australian territory. Despite the mountain of work that has been churned out by academics on this proposal some of whom are the same people who question the Anzac legend it is an aspiration supported by a miniscule number of people, about the same size as opposition to Anzac Day.
I just noticed that we've already discussed the "Criticism and protests" section before in Criticism and protests , Criticism section again. I hope were not just rehashing the same thing.
Good Essays words | ( pages) | Preview Gallipoli - The Anzac Legend - Gallipoli - The Anzac Legend The Anzac Legend is the source of the Aussie Fight and bravery that will live on for future generations to understand and to acknowledge their courage and bravery.
Activity / 97% to do anzac day trading tips. Why are some of anzac legend essay essay. Sample or cool weather vnesok. La tourism, anzac. Photo essays on anzac day taboos, ipod touch, anzac day trading hours anzac day assignment helpers malaysia sapporo ice festival trip to children dissertation writing service. Please edit punctuation and stuff tg8 - c2j - c2j - papergood.
Essay about Anzac Sprit Words | 3 Pages. The ANZAC legend is many things to many people, to me the legend is as relevant today as it was 95 years ago, it is who we are as a people. The Anzac Legend is the Australian Spirit. Essay on Gallipoli and the ANZAC Legend Question: Courage, mateship, determination, resourcefulness, and a sense of humour are identified as characteristics of the NAZAC tradition and spirit.
The ANZAC legend inspires generations of Australians and ANZAC Day; 25th April is a constant reminder. Gallipoli was altogether a failure, due to the mass deaths, casualties and military strategies. In the six months, many major battles occurred at: Krithia, Suvla Bay and Lone territorios-luchas.tks: 2. These traits have come to represent the Anzac legend, which is evident in Australia today be it in war, conflict or peacetime. The Anzac spirit was displayed daily through the eight month conflict at Gallipoli/5(11).